<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Copy Cosmetics Communicate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/what-copy-cosmetics-communicate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/what-copy-cosmetics-communicate/</link>
	<description>Blog promotion, social marketing, and link building tips.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 04:57:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Szponder</title>
		<link>http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/what-copy-cosmetics-communicate/comment-page-1/#comment-41118</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Szponder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackhumphrey.com/fridaytrafficreport/copywriting/what-copy-cosmetics-communicate/#comment-41118</guid>
		<description>I can understand using intentional misspellings to draw attention to the copy/point being made. However, I&#039;ve seen some copy that was so highlighted, bolded, misspelled, various fonts and sizes and colors, that I simply clicked away. I think you make a good point about knowing the rules before you break them. Even when you know the rules and break them, though, you&#039;ll have more success when it&#039;s not overdone.

&lt;em&gt;Cindy Szponder&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://cindyszponder.com/how-to-have-a-positive-mental-attitude-for-blogging/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;How to Have a Positive Mental Attitude for Blogging&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand using intentional misspellings to draw attention to the copy/point being made. However, I&#8217;ve seen some copy that was so highlighted, bolded, misspelled, various fonts and sizes and colors, that I simply clicked away. I think you make a good point about knowing the rules before you break them. Even when you know the rules and break them, though, you&#8217;ll have more success when it&#8217;s not overdone.</p>
<p><em>Cindy Szponder&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://cindyszponder.com/how-to-have-a-positive-mental-attitude-for-blogging/'>How to Have a Positive Mental Attitude for Blogging</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Tiano</title>
		<link>http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/what-copy-cosmetics-communicate/comment-page-1/#comment-41036</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Tiano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackhumphrey.com/fridaytrafficreport/copywriting/what-copy-cosmetics-communicate/#comment-41036</guid>
		<description>Great post as always, Michel!

Seems to me there&#039;s a trend toward cleaner, more pro use of graphics - particularly with all the &quot;Web 2.0&quot; salesletter graphics packs around lately.

Personally, when something looks too &quot;homemade,&quot; there is a credibility gap.

Eben Pagan still uses the plain, no graphics, style - must still work.

At the end of the day, whether it&#039;s graphics/no graphics, clean/cluttered, video/long copy - each market/product may get different results, and you can only know what works best for your market/product through testing.

There will always be a place for great copy!

Thanks, Jack, for all the great content on your blog!

Howard &quot;IM OutSourcerer&quot; Tiano</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post as always, Michel!</p>
<p>Seems to me there&#8217;s a trend toward cleaner, more pro use of graphics &#8211; particularly with all the &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; salesletter graphics packs around lately.</p>
<p>Personally, when something looks too &#8220;homemade,&#8221; there is a credibility gap.</p>
<p>Eben Pagan still uses the plain, no graphics, style &#8211; must still work.</p>
<p>At the end of the day, whether it&#8217;s graphics/no graphics, clean/cluttered, video/long copy &#8211; each market/product may get different results, and you can only know what works best for your market/product through testing.</p>
<p>There will always be a place for great copy!</p>
<p>Thanks, Jack, for all the great content on your blog!</p>
<p>Howard &#8220;IM OutSourcerer&#8221; Tiano</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
