<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Check Your Google Supplemental Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/how-to-check-your-google-supplemental-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/how-to-check-your-google-supplemental-results/</link>
	<description>Blog promotion, social marketing, and link building tips.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhi Arora</title>
		<link>http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/how-to-check-your-google-supplemental-results/comment-page-1/#comment-151090</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhi Arora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 06:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackhumphrey.com/fridaytrafficreport/search-engine-optimization/how-to-check-your-google-supplemental-results/#comment-151090</guid>
		<description>I have noticed a few good pages which showed in the supplemental results search mentioned above while also being in the regular index, but largely most of the pages that show up as supplemental using that search are of low value and / or not very unique and / or have limited linkage data pointing at them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have noticed a few good pages which showed in the supplemental results search mentioned above while also being in the regular index, but largely most of the pages that show up as supplemental using that search are of low value and / or not very unique and / or have limited linkage data pointing at them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seoweb@seo &#38; internet in UA</title>
		<link>http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/how-to-check-your-google-supplemental-results/comment-page-1/#comment-142869</link>
		<dc:creator>Seoweb@seo &#38; internet in UA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 11:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackhumphrey.com/fridaytrafficreport/search-engine-optimization/how-to-check-your-google-supplemental-results/#comment-142869</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this post, now I see that my blog is under penalties..
Excerpts are also a nice idea ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this post, now I see that my blog is under penalties..<br />
Excerpts are also a nice idea <img src='http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is Supplemental Index of Google? &#124; Associate Strategies By Associate Expert V.K. Rajagopalan</title>
		<link>http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/how-to-check-your-google-supplemental-results/comment-page-1/#comment-36199</link>
		<dc:creator>What is Supplemental Index of Google? &#124; Associate Strategies By Associate Expert V.K. Rajagopalan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackhumphrey.com/fridaytrafficreport/search-engine-optimization/how-to-check-your-google-supplemental-results/#comment-36199</guid>
		<description>[...] solution, albeit lengthy, to avoiding the supplemental results foreover and on auto-pilot. This page of Jack discusses how to check how many of your pages are on the supplemental results and this page [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] solution, albeit lengthy, to avoiding the supplemental results foreover and on auto-pilot. This page of Jack discusses how to check how many of your pages are on the supplemental results and this page [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is Supplemental Index of Google? &#124; The Associate Reference</title>
		<link>http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/how-to-check-your-google-supplemental-results/comment-page-1/#comment-8690</link>
		<dc:creator>What is Supplemental Index of Google? &#124; The Associate Reference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 17:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackhumphrey.com/fridaytrafficreport/search-engine-optimization/how-to-check-your-google-supplemental-results/#comment-8690</guid>
		<description>[...] At Jack Humphrey&#039;s Blog, Friday Traffic Report, Jack has made a post which gives you an excellent solution, albeit lengthy, to avoiding the supplemental results foreover and on auto-pilot. This page of Jack discusses how to check how many of your pages are on the supplemental results and this page gives you a comprehensive solution for the GSI problem. google supplemental index gsi Search Engine Ranking supplemental result [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] At Jack Humphrey&#39;s Blog, Friday Traffic Report, Jack has made a post which gives you an excellent solution, albeit lengthy, to avoiding the supplemental results foreover and on auto-pilot. This page of Jack discusses how to check how many of your pages are on the supplemental results and this page gives you a comprehensive solution for the GSI problem. google supplemental index gsi Search Engine Ranking supplemental result [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Johnstone</title>
		<link>http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/how-to-check-your-google-supplemental-results/comment-page-1/#comment-8609</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Johnstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackhumphrey.com/fridaytrafficreport/search-engine-optimization/how-to-check-your-google-supplemental-results/#comment-8609</guid>
		<description>Hi Jack,

Many thanks for sharing your results! I&#039;m glad to hear they worked for you.

However, my own results and research in this area lead me to emphasize a couple of further points:

	•	eliminating urls on your site with the same content is part of the solution, but it is not a general solution for everyone
	⁃	For example, on my site (homemusicrecording.com), I implemented the &quot;the_excerpt&quot; code as recommended by Lorelle on May 5th 2007. Up until last week, all but 4 of my urls remained in Google&#039;s Supplemental index.
	•	Some WordPress Themes already incorporate this functionality when the &quot;more&quot; option is used in a post; this is true or partially true in 9 of the 11 Widgetized themes provided with WordPress Master. 

So I suggest anyone aiming to combat Google Supplementitis with this tactic asks the following questions before embarking on what may be a fruitless task:

	1.	Does my Theme already support display of summaries for all post listings, except the permalink?
	⁃	If it does, use &quot;more&quot; or an Explicit Optional Excerpt with every post
	2.	If not, is it worth the effort to customize the code?
	⁃	Yes! - for anyone, like Jack, with many existing posts on their site
	⁃	No! - for everyone else; just use &quot;more&quot; or an Explicit Optional Excerpt with every post

I&#039;m unable, without a valid test procedure covering a sufficient number of sites, to draw conclusions which can be reliably applied to other blog websites in general. The IM world is subject to far too many variables...

However, we can certainly learn from each other, and where sufficient information is provided, adopt the emerging &quot;best practices&quot; with reasonable confidence.

Cheers,
Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jack,</p>
<p>Many thanks for sharing your results! I&#8217;m glad to hear they worked for you.</p>
<p>However, my own results and research in this area lead me to emphasize a couple of further points:</p>
<p>	•	eliminating urls on your site with the same content is part of the solution, but it is not a general solution for everyone<br />
	⁃	For example, on my site (homemusicrecording.com), I implemented the &#8220;the_excerpt&#8221; code as recommended by Lorelle on May 5th 2007. Up until last week, all but 4 of my urls remained in Google&#8217;s Supplemental index.<br />
	•	Some WordPress Themes already incorporate this functionality when the &#8220;more&#8221; option is used in a post; this is true or partially true in 9 of the 11 Widgetized themes provided with WordPress Master. </p>
<p>So I suggest anyone aiming to combat Google Supplementitis with this tactic asks the following questions before embarking on what may be a fruitless task:</p>
<p>	1.	Does my Theme already support display of summaries for all post listings, except the permalink?<br />
	⁃	If it does, use &#8220;more&#8221; or an Explicit Optional Excerpt with every post<br />
	2.	If not, is it worth the effort to customize the code?<br />
	⁃	Yes! &#8211; for anyone, like Jack, with many existing posts on their site<br />
	⁃	No! &#8211; for everyone else; just use &#8220;more&#8221; or an Explicit Optional Excerpt with every post</p>
<p>I&#8217;m unable, without a valid test procedure covering a sufficient number of sites, to draw conclusions which can be reliably applied to other blog websites in general. The IM world is subject to far too many variables&#8230;</p>
<p>However, we can certainly learn from each other, and where sufficient information is provided, adopt the emerging &#8220;best practices&#8221; with reasonable confidence.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.fridaytrafficreport.com/how-to-check-your-google-supplemental-results/feed/ ) in 0.73988 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 2:40 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 3:40 am UTC -->
