<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Buying Digg for $200,000,000?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/google-buying-digg-for-200000000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/google-buying-digg-for-200000000/</link>
	<description>Blog promotion, social marketing, and link building tips.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Design Lincolnshire</title>
		<link>http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/google-buying-digg-for-200000000/comment-page-1/#comment-59372</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Design Lincolnshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 18:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackhumphrey.com/fridaytrafficreport/friday-traffic-report/google-buying-digg-for-200000000/#comment-59372</guid>
		<description>Google buying Digg. I can see a pattern with YouTube and Digg, paying the social media, it is a good idea, because Google could easily merge. 

I am surprised to hear in the UK, that Google is the number one brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google buying Digg. I can see a pattern with YouTube and Digg, paying the social media, it is a good idea, because Google could easily merge. </p>
<p>I am surprised to hear in the UK, that Google is the number one brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: social marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/google-buying-digg-for-200000000/comment-page-1/#comment-59351</link>
		<dc:creator>social marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackhumphrey.com/fridaytrafficreport/friday-traffic-report/google-buying-digg-for-200000000/#comment-59351</guid>
		<description>@Scott Henderson,

You don&#039;t think Google will use our votes in Websearch or how about blogsearch when they roll out a Google social?

Don&#039;t you realize that 50 to 100 Diggs is all it takes for me to overtake most of my competitors in Google? I can take #1 on ANY niche term with  100+ Diggs. So, if Google is taking results from Digg and then using them as a quality indicator right now, how can you think that Google will not do it with their own social network that they have full control over?

If you use the right social sites, the social bookmark post will show up right along with your original blog post in results. Now I have canned two of my competitors. Next do a YouTube video and work my magic on that one. Now I will have three items in the top ten.

Everyting I am describing is whitehat and natural results to Google. Scott I am afraid you are way behind the times. No insult intended, no flame here, but I have to correct you less it rub off on others.

&lt;em&gt;social marketing&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.keywebdata.com/?p=131&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google Dumps Digg and Walks Out as Acquisition Seems Near&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Scott Henderson,</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t think Google will use our votes in Websearch or how about blogsearch when they roll out a Google social?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you realize that 50 to 100 Diggs is all it takes for me to overtake most of my competitors in Google? I can take #1 on ANY niche term with  100+ Diggs. So, if Google is taking results from Digg and then using them as a quality indicator right now, how can you think that Google will not do it with their own social network that they have full control over?</p>
<p>If you use the right social sites, the social bookmark post will show up right along with your original blog post in results. Now I have canned two of my competitors. Next do a YouTube video and work my magic on that one. Now I will have three items in the top ten.</p>
<p>Everyting I am describing is whitehat and natural results to Google. Scott I am afraid you are way behind the times. No insult intended, no flame here, but I have to correct you less it rub off on others.</p>
<p><em>social marketing&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.keywebdata.com/?p=131' rel="nofollow">Google Dumps Digg and Walks Out as Acquisition Seems Near</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: social marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/google-buying-digg-for-200000000/comment-page-1/#comment-59349</link>
		<dc:creator>social marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackhumphrey.com/fridaytrafficreport/friday-traffic-report/google-buying-digg-for-200000000/#comment-59349</guid>
		<description>Jack, I wanted to let you know that the Google / Digg deal is off. 

It looks like we better get ready for a Google social profile and see what happens to search results as time goes by. I already have lots of ideas about this. Does this mean I can start beating Saleem&#039;s crappy two year old articles about how to get more Diggs?

Oh, yeah that&#039;s right, while he is #2 on Digg I will have to suffer in silence.

The full article is on TechCrunch and it is the only post today so it will come up under the domain in this post of yours. Read the comments, I left many on this post, what a bunch they have over there when it comes to social site stuff. LOL

- Chris

&lt;em&gt;social marketing&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.keywebdata.com/?p=131&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google Dumps Digg and Walks Out as Acquisition Seems Near&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack, I wanted to let you know that the Google / Digg deal is off. </p>
<p>It looks like we better get ready for a Google social profile and see what happens to search results as time goes by. I already have lots of ideas about this. Does this mean I can start beating Saleem&#8217;s crappy two year old articles about how to get more Diggs?</p>
<p>Oh, yeah that&#8217;s right, while he is #2 on Digg I will have to suffer in silence.</p>
<p>The full article is on TechCrunch and it is the only post today so it will come up under the domain in this post of yours. Read the comments, I left many on this post, what a bunch they have over there when it comes to social site stuff. LOL</p>
<p>- Chris</p>
<p><em>social marketing&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.keywebdata.com/?p=131' rel="nofollow">Google Dumps Digg and Walks Out as Acquisition Seems Near</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daryl</title>
		<link>http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/google-buying-digg-for-200000000/comment-page-1/#comment-59262</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 18:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackhumphrey.com/fridaytrafficreport/friday-traffic-report/google-buying-digg-for-200000000/#comment-59262</guid>
		<description>Hi Jack 

I know I&#039;m late to the party but just saw this on TechCrunch : 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/26/google-walks-away-from-digg-deal/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google walks away from Digg Deal&lt;/a&gt;

Personally I&#039;m pleased with this. a company that seemingly wants to buy everything in site worries me a little bit.

&lt;em&gt;Daryl&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheDatingTip/~3/346726345/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Romance Scams - Date With Deceit&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jack </p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m late to the party but just saw this on TechCrunch : </p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/26/google-walks-away-from-digg-deal/" rel="nofollow">Google walks away from Digg Deal</a></p>
<p>Personally I&#8217;m pleased with this. a company that seemingly wants to buy everything in site worries me a little bit.</p>
<p><em>Daryl&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheDatingTip/~3/346726345/' rel="nofollow">Romance Scams &#8211; Date With Deceit</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Hendison</title>
		<link>http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/google-buying-digg-for-200000000/comment-page-1/#comment-59137</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Hendison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackhumphrey.com/fridaytrafficreport/friday-traffic-report/google-buying-digg-for-200000000/#comment-59137</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be surprised if this were ever integrated into anything other than personalized search, and even then, it would likely be only for the individual users serps, not the public at large. 

The day someone could actually  &quot;vote down&quot; their competitors website and have it actually impact their visibility will be a dark day indeed...

&lt;em&gt;Scott Hendison&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/computers-how-to/stop-xp-auto-update-reboots-with-group-policy-editor/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Stop XP Auto Update Reboots with Group Policy Editor&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be surprised if this were ever integrated into anything other than personalized search, and even then, it would likely be only for the individual users serps, not the public at large. </p>
<p>The day someone could actually  &#8220;vote down&#8221; their competitors website and have it actually impact their visibility will be a dark day indeed&#8230;</p>
<p><em>Scott Hendison&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.pdxtc.com/wpblog/computers-how-to/stop-xp-auto-update-reboots-with-group-policy-editor/' rel="nofollow">Stop XP Auto Update Reboots with Group Policy Editor</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK Swopes</title>
		<link>http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/google-buying-digg-for-200000000/comment-page-1/#comment-59060</link>
		<dc:creator>JK Swopes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackhumphrey.com/fridaytrafficreport/friday-traffic-report/google-buying-digg-for-200000000/#comment-59060</guid>
		<description>Wow...Google is always doing something! They just opened their own affiliate network, now this!

&lt;em&gt;JK Swopes&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImWithJoe/~3/344551229/imwithjoe-flips-moneybitescom&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IMwithJoe flips out on moneybites.com and Market Leverage&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;Google is always doing something! They just opened their own affiliate network, now this!</p>
<p><em>JK Swopes&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImWithJoe/~3/344551229/imwithjoe-flips-moneybitescom' rel="nofollow">IMwithJoe flips out on moneybites.com and Market Leverage</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.fridaytrafficreport.com/google-buying-digg-for-200000000/feed/ ) in 0.52427 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 9:45 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 10:45 am UTC -->
