I’ve made some additions and tweaks to the FTR Insiders Club recently.
Just added:
73 interviews with info marketing experts!
New price:
For a limited time you can get a lifetime membership to my best stuff!
Why be an FTRIC member? Read why here.
Related Posts - Link Baiting, Viral Marketing, Viral Linking Lee Oddin at TopRankBlog brings up a good point about renaming old things to make them new again in one of his latest posts....
- Blame The Copywriter, Not The Copy Guest Post by Michel Fortin I’m seeing a lot of posts in public forums these days about people getting really sick and tired of seeing...
- Outsourcing Truly Changes The Game A lot of people have asked me how I do "all this." I sure couldn't pull off two large membership sites, this blog, consulting, training,...
Related Sites - The Steve Prefontaine Guide to Getting Rich Steve Prefontaine was one of the greatest long-distance runners of all time. I became a huge fan of his after watching Without Limits and Prefontaine...
- Seascape Golf Club, Aptos, CA Seascape Golf Club is located in Aptos, CA Phone: 831-688-3213 Website: http://www.seascapegc.com Course History: Seascape Golf Club was originally known as Rio Del Mar when...
- WebProsperity Update So what have YOU been doing with your WebProsperity membership? Are you using it as a primary business? Or are you using it to support...



{ 1 trackback }
{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }
Hi Jack
I’m caught in the middle of a BIG debate here.
Do you have view on Google ‘Sandboxing’? Some folks claim that if you get lots of links into a new site quickly it will cause Google to think ‘cheat!’ and stick your site in the supplementary index for a few months. (The infamous ’sand box’.)
True? Not true? Either way you’ll have a ton of evidence from so many start-up authority sites on your system, so you’re going to have come across this issue.
Your view?
Enjoying / profiting from your content as ever.
Jonathan Gunson
(And yes, we’ll do that ‘Famous Jack’ interview soon
)
Jonathan,
The term “lots of links” is the problem. It matters what KIND of links those are. Social links in Twitter, etc. or from a lot of bloggers who pick up a hot story on your site and link to it – no sandbox.
A bunch of directory links? Easy for Google to see that big increase and do something, if they want. But I don’t think it’s an across the board trigger.
A good method is to have a killer linkbait piece at the same time you’re getting a lot of social buzz to mix in the links from directories all at once.
The more “legit” links mask the more seo’d links and it looks like someone just got a big bunch of attention from the sphere.
I don’t hear about the sandbox much anymore from our new site builders. They are pretty much building links like mad without any noticeable penalty.
This would be the first time in many months anyone has asked a sandbox question. That has to count for something. Back when Google was sandboxing right and left, I could see 5 or more q’s a day on the issue, easy.
Jack
That’s a pretty clear view on the ‘lots of links’ sandbox issue thanks. Social reaction and ‘legit’ links makes sense. Re linkbait – we only ever use original content, so that is starting to look like a no brainer. All good.
Thanks
Jonathan