<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ecommerce Goes Social</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/ecommerce-goes-social/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/ecommerce-goes-social/</link>
	<description>Blog promotion, social marketing, and link building tips.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; eCommerce gets with the Social Media Program</title>
		<link>http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/ecommerce-goes-social/comment-page-1/#comment-36987</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; eCommerce gets with the Social Media Program</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 02:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackhumphrey.com/fridaytrafficreport/brilliant-ideas/ecommerce-goes-social/#comment-36987</guid>
		<description>[...] Jack Humphrey shares his view on this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jack Humphrey shares his view on this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Menayan</title>
		<link>http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/ecommerce-goes-social/comment-page-1/#comment-36965</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Menayan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackhumphrey.com/fridaytrafficreport/brilliant-ideas/ecommerce-goes-social/#comment-36965</guid>
		<description>Hi Jack,

I appreciate the reply. We do pride ourselves on having a generous revenue share compared to some like Squidoo (which, I believe, offers 50% of profits = after costs/expenses; we offer 60% of revenue). It does work for a lot of people who are inclined to write a lot of one-off topical articles.

I can understand that AdSense, which is wholly contextually-driven, not working as well on a blog, where contextual nuance is a lot harder to decipher and match to ads.

But yes, there are plenty of users who are there to promote their own sites/blogs, which is fine with us, provided they write original content on our site (and don&#039;t just trot out copied stuff, which is just plain lazy) and they don&#039;t get overly aggressive with linking. I agree, for them, rev share might be just the icing on the cake rather than the main draw.

Best,
Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jack,</p>
<p>I appreciate the reply. We do pride ourselves on having a generous revenue share compared to some like Squidoo (which, I believe, offers 50% of profits = after costs/expenses; we offer 60% of revenue). It does work for a lot of people who are inclined to write a lot of one-off topical articles.</p>
<p>I can understand that AdSense, which is wholly contextually-driven, not working as well on a blog, where contextual nuance is a lot harder to decipher and match to ads.</p>
<p>But yes, there are plenty of users who are there to promote their own sites/blogs, which is fine with us, provided they write original content on our site (and don&#8217;t just trot out copied stuff, which is just plain lazy) and they don&#8217;t get overly aggressive with linking. I agree, for them, rev share might be just the icing on the cake rather than the main draw.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/ecommerce-goes-social/comment-page-1/#comment-36954</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackhumphrey.com/fridaytrafficreport/brilliant-ideas/ecommerce-goes-social/#comment-36954</guid>
		<description>Jack,

That sure got a quick rise out of the folks at HubPages!  It is nice that they share some revenue but there is need for better models. They will probably start appearing as Web2.0 expands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack,</p>
<p>That sure got a quick rise out of the folks at HubPages!  It is nice that they share some revenue but there is need for better models. They will probably start appearing as Web2.0 expands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Loesch</title>
		<link>http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/ecommerce-goes-social/comment-page-1/#comment-36951</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Loesch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackhumphrey.com/fridaytrafficreport/brilliant-ideas/ecommerce-goes-social/#comment-36951</guid>
		<description>Hey Jack,
I went over and checked this site out and had a question that I could not find the answers to over on their site.  My son is an aspiring artist and is interested in  having some of his drawings used on a clothing line, so this post caught my eye.  By submitting your artwork for votes and consideration it seems to me that if your artwork is chosen or favorited highly they will use that artwork on their Tee Shirts, do you lose the rights to that artwork.  This model would work great if you got a piece of the revenue created from the sold shirts and were able to keep your design rights.  The Cafe Press model works perfectly for this, maybe they should add a more social method of communicating with the users of their site.

&lt;em&gt;Ray Loesch&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.raymondloesch.com/if-i-die-before-i-wake/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;If I Die Before I Wake&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jack,<br />
I went over and checked this site out and had a question that I could not find the answers to over on their site.  My son is an aspiring artist and is interested in  having some of his drawings used on a clothing line, so this post caught my eye.  By submitting your artwork for votes and consideration it seems to me that if your artwork is chosen or favorited highly they will use that artwork on their Tee Shirts, do you lose the rights to that artwork.  This model would work great if you got a piece of the revenue created from the sold shirts and were able to keep your design rights.  The Cafe Press model works perfectly for this, maybe they should add a more social method of communicating with the users of their site.</p>
<p><em>Ray Loesch&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.raymondloesch.com/if-i-die-before-i-wake/' rel="nofollow">If I Die Before I Wake</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Humphrey</title>
		<link>http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/ecommerce-goes-social/comment-page-1/#comment-36902</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Humphrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 01:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackhumphrey.com/fridaytrafficreport/brilliant-ideas/ecommerce-goes-social/#comment-36902</guid>
		<description>Jason,

I guess that reads a little harsh now that I look at it again.  You&#039;re right that your 60% is more generous than many rev share social sites out there.

And there&#039;s no denying at all the search engine visibility HubPages offers.  The rev share actually means nothing to me because I am there to use good content to generate more visibility.

That visibility going to sites of mine which have long given up on Adsense as a revenue model.  Maybe you guys are thinking about other higher paying ways to bring in more income for the average user, but most people I work with are at HubPages for the visibility rather than the rev share.

My excitement over seeing a new model of rev share got the best of me and I could have easily picked on someone else in my example who&#039;d end up being far more deserving of the comparison than HubPages.

You guys could end your rev share today and still have plenty of people building out the property for the sheer benefit of visibility alone.  I must be responsible for sending at least 100 regular users over and I will continue to do so, but with the focus being on visibility and not making a killing on the rev share, even if it&#039;s better than a lot of others out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason,</p>
<p>I guess that reads a little harsh now that I look at it again.  You&#8217;re right that your 60% is more generous than many rev share social sites out there.</p>
<p>And there&#8217;s no denying at all the search engine visibility HubPages offers.  The rev share actually means nothing to me because I am there to use good content to generate more visibility.</p>
<p>That visibility going to sites of mine which have long given up on Adsense as a revenue model.  Maybe you guys are thinking about other higher paying ways to bring in more income for the average user, but most people I work with are at HubPages for the visibility rather than the rev share.</p>
<p>My excitement over seeing a new model of rev share got the best of me and I could have easily picked on someone else in my example who&#8217;d end up being far more deserving of the comparison than HubPages.</p>
<p>You guys could end your rev share today and still have plenty of people building out the property for the sheer benefit of visibility alone.  I must be responsible for sending at least 100 regular users over and I will continue to do so, but with the focus being on visibility and not making a killing on the rev share, even if it&#8217;s better than a lot of others out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Menayan</title>
		<link>http://www.fridaytrafficreport.com/ecommerce-goes-social/comment-page-1/#comment-36901</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Menayan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackhumphrey.com/fridaytrafficreport/brilliant-ideas/ecommerce-goes-social/#comment-36901</guid>
		<description>Well, we offer 60% of the revenue a user&#039;s page generates, so I wouldn&#039;t say that we&#039;re the stingiest one in our space. Maybe you&#039;re thinking of one of our competitors?

In fact, we&#039;re one of the most generous, and lots of our users are happy with the hundreds of dollars per month (or more) that they&#039;re making on the site. What HubPages also offers is search engine visibility. A blogger trying to get the same traction from Google and Yahoo with articles posted on their new-to-the-world blog would be sorely disappointed, relatively speaking.

Jason Menayan 
HubPages</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, we offer 60% of the revenue a user&#8217;s page generates, so I wouldn&#8217;t say that we&#8217;re the stingiest one in our space. Maybe you&#8217;re thinking of one of our competitors?</p>
<p>In fact, we&#8217;re one of the most generous, and lots of our users are happy with the hundreds of dollars per month (or more) that they&#8217;re making on the site. What HubPages also offers is search engine visibility. A blogger trying to get the same traction from Google and Yahoo with articles posted on their new-to-the-world blog would be sorely disappointed, relatively speaking.</p>
<p>Jason Menayan<br />
HubPages</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.fridaytrafficreport.com/ecommerce-goes-social/feed/ ) in 0.48711 seconds, on Feb 8th, 2012 at 4:55 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 8th, 2012 at 5:55 am UTC -->
